A medication administration record (MAR) is the log of every dose a carer gave, prompted, or did not give, and why. On paper it lives in a folder in the client's kitchen and the office sees it once a month. An electronic MAR (eMAR) is the same record, kept on the carer's phone at the moment the dose is given, and visible in the office as it happens.
Home care providers support medication at three levels, and the care plan should say which applies to each person and each medicine:
The record needs to reflect the level. "Prompted" and "administered" are different events with different responsibility, and a MAR that only offers a tick cannot tell them apart.
The relevant guidance for domiciliary care in England is NICE guideline NG67, Managing medicines for adults receiving social care in the community. Among other things it expects providers to have a clear record of which medicines a person takes and what support they need with each; to record what was given, when, by whom and, where relevant, why not; to have a process for medicines-related safeguarding and incidents; and to make sure care workers are trained and assessed as competent before they handle medicines. The CQC draws on NG67 when it looks at the Safe key question for a home care provider.
None of that requires software. All of it is easier with software, because the record is complete by construction and the office can see a gap the same day.
Paper MAR charts fail in predictable ways, and each one is invisible until the monthly collection or the incident:
An eMAR closes each of these structurally: the dose is recorded at the visit, by the carer who is checked in, with the outcome chosen from a list, and the office sees a refused or missed dose the same day.
PRN ("as required") medicines need three extra things on the record: the reason the medicine may be given (for example, pain), the minimum interval and maximum in 24 hours, and a note of why it was given and whether it worked. A carer should never have to guess whether it is too soon for the next paracetamol.
Refused doses are the person's right and must be recorded as refused with the reason, never as "not given". Repeated refusal is a change in the person, and the record should make that visible to the office so it can be raised with the GP.
Missed doses — a scheduled dose that was not recorded at all — are the safety event. The office needs to see them the same day, and the incident process needs to know when a missed dose is a medication error.
The point of an eMAR for the manager is the audit that does itself: doses due against doses recorded, per client, per carer, per week, with refusals and misses listed. That is the medicines compliance figure an inspector asks for, and it is also the early warning. A carer whose recording rate drops, or a client whose refusals climb, is a conversation to have this week, not at the next review.
In Carelo each client's medication is held on their record with strength, dose, times, level of support and the carer's response rule, and every scheduled dose appears in the carer app inside the call it belongs to. The carer records the outcome and a note at the moment of giving, tied to their check-in. Refusals and missed doses appear on the client's dashboard and the office's call monitoring the same day, every change to a medication is logged with who and why, and the MAR report gives medicines compliance for any period. It is part of every plan. See the features page for the rest of the care record.
Yes. The CQC is concerned with whether the record is accurate, complete, contemporaneous and available, not with its medium. An eMAR that is completed at the visit generally evidences those things more easily than paper.
The record should be kept on the phone and sent when signal returns, with the original time. Ask any supplier to show you an offline dose being recorded before you buy.
Many providers keep the pharmacy sheet in the home as the source of what was prescribed and use the eMAR as the record of what was given. What matters is that the eMAR reflects the current prescription and that changes are made with a clear reason and author.